The general impression in sport is that attack is “stud” and defence is “Fighter“. This is mainly because defence (in any game, pretty much) is primarily about not making errors, and being disciplined. Flamboyance can pay off in attack, when you only need to strike occasionally, but not in defence, where the real payoff comes … Continue reading “Studs and Fighters and Attack and Defence”
As far as this blog is concerned, the concept of studs and fighters began sometime in 2007, when I wrote the canonical blog post on the topic. Since then the topic has been much used and abused. Recently, though, I remembered when I had first come across the concept of studs and fighters. This goes … Continue reading “Studs and fighters: Origin”
Tech twitter, for the last week, has been inundated with unending debate on this tweetstorm by a VC about “10X engineers”. The tweetstorm was engineered by Shekhar Kirani, a Partner at Accel Partners. I have friends and twitter-followees on both sides of the debate. There isn’t much to describe more about the “paksh” side of … Continue reading “10X Studs and Fighters”
In a blog post yesterday I talked about the marriage and dating markets and how people with spikes which can be evaluated either highly positively or highly negatively were more likely to get dates, while in the arranged marriage market, you were better off being a solid CMP (common minimum program). The question is how … Continue reading “Studs, fighters and spikes”
Ok so here we come to the holy grail. The grand unification. Kunal Sawardekar can scream even more loudly now. Two concepts that i’ve much used and abused over the last year or so come together. In a post that will probably be the end of both these concepts in the blogging format. I think … Continue reading “Arranged Scissors 15: Stud and Fighter Beauty”
It’s been a long time since I wrote about the Studs and Fighters framework. I had overdosed on it a few months back, when I’d put some 3 posts in 4 days or something, but that was when I was hajaar enthu about corporate affairs. It’s been almost two months since I quit my last … Continue reading “Studs and Fighters and Form”
I don’t have sources here but enough people have cribbed that nowadays too many MBAs are going into finance, and banking, and not too many of them get into “real management” jobs, which is what the country/the world desires them to get into. I clearly remmeber a Mint column on this topic by Govind Sankaranarayanan. … Continue reading “Why MBAs do finance – a studs and fighters perspective”
When people crib to other people that their job is not too exciting and that it’s too process-oriented and that there’s not muc scope for independend thinking, the usual response is that no job is inherently process-oriented or thinking-oriented, and that what matters is the way in which one perceives his job. People usually say … Continue reading “Don’t use stud processes for fighter jobs and fighter processes for stud jobs”
My apologies for the third S&F post in four days. However, this blog represents an impression of the flow of thought through my head, and if I try to time my thoughts to suit readers’ interests and variety, I’m afraid I may not be doing a very good job. I came across this funda in … Continue reading “Stud and Fighter Instructions”
Insight of the day: Batting is inherently fighter and bowling is inherently stud. Of course there are severral stud batsmen (eg. Sehwag) and fighter bowlers (eg. Giles) but if you look at it broadly – a batsman needs to get it right every ball, while a bowler needs only one ball to succeed. The fundamental … Continue reading “Fighter Batsmen and Stud Bowlers”